Investigation Finds Sufficient Evidence of Guilt in 2020 Election Efforts
Donald Trump would have been convicted for his actions surrounding the 2020 election were it not for his successful bid for the presidency in 2024, according to special counsel Jack Smith’s report. Released on Tuesday by the justice department, the document outlines extensive findings about Trump’s attempts to overturn his electoral defeat.
Smith, appointed after the January 6 Capitol insurrection, concluded that his team’s evidence was strong enough to secure a conviction. However, the constitutional immunity granted to a sitting president prevented prosecution. Smith wrote, “The department’s position is unequivocal: a president cannot face indictment during their term, irrespective of the charges or evidence strength.”
Trump, who was impeached for inciting the January 6 riot and indicted on multiple charges, maintained his innocence and dismissed the investigation as politically driven. In a Truth Social post, he labelled Smith a “failed prosecutor.”
The report highlights Trump’s tactics, including pressuring officials, promoting false election claims, and orchestrating efforts to delay the certification of Joe Biden’s victory. While much of this evidence was previously public, the document reveals new considerations, such as the potential use of the Insurrection Act against Trump—ultimately deemed too legally precarious.
Despite legal setbacks, Smith’s report asserts the importance of upholding the rule of law, stating: “The integrity of our work will inspire others to pursue justice, no matter the challenges.”
A separate, unreleased section details allegations of mishandling sensitive documents, with ongoing cases involving Trump associates. As Trump prepares for his second inauguration, the debate over his legal and political legacy intensifies.
