The party vows to address the Raac crisis affecting NHS buildings, accusing the Conservatives of inaction

The Liberal Democrats have committed to spending £1 billion a year on repairing “crumbling” NHS hospitals if they win the upcoming General Election, highlighting the dangerous condition of healthcare facilities suffering from the deteriorating reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete (Raac).

Accusing the Conservative government of failing to tackle the issue, Lib Dem deputy leader Daisy Cooper criticised the inaction on Raac, claiming millions of patients would be treated in unsafe hospitals by 2030. Cooper warned that the NHS has been left to “crumble,” with patients and staff forced to work in hazardous environments. She stressed that the NHS should not be in a “constant state of fear” due to the safety risks posed by deteriorating buildings.

Raac, a material once commonly used in construction, has been identified as a significant risk in public buildings, including schools and hospitals. The concrete has reached the end of its expected lifespan and is now crumbling, threatening the integrity of essential healthcare facilities.

NHS Providers’ CEO Sir Julian Hartley emphasised the severity of the issue, stating that “crucial chunks of the NHS estate are literally falling to bits” because of years of underinvestment. The NHS Confederation also voiced concern, suggesting that £1 billion would “barely scratch the surface” of the NHS’s £11.6 billion backlog in maintenance and repairs. Dr. Layla McCay, policy director at the NHS Confederation, pointed out that dilapidated buildings not only demoralise staff but also pose safety risks for patients and hinder productivity.

Despite the Liberal Democrats’ pledge, the party’s critics, including Health Secretary Victoria Atkins, dismissed the proposal. Atkins argued that the Lib Dems were merely “snipe[ing] from the sidelines” and promised “ridiculous gimmicks,” accusing them of supporting a Labour government without offering real solutions. She countered by highlighting the Conservative government’s own plan, which includes building 40 new hospitals by 2030 and launching 160 diagnostic centres ahead of schedule, which have already delivered over seven million tests, checks, and scans across the country.

The government had previously committed to prioritising the rebuilding of NHS facilities affected by Raac. However, the issue remains unresolved in many hospitals, with only four of the 58 Raac-impacted hospitals addressing the issue thus far.

As the election approaches, the crumbling state of the NHS estate remains a critical point of contention, with both major parties offering contrasting approaches to addressing the crisis.

Debate on migration policy sees Labour clash with Reform UK, with calls to uphold international human rights commitments

Labour’s Nick Thomas-Symonds has warned that if the UK were to withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), it would be relegated to the status of a “pariah state,” following a heated debate on migration policy.

The debate, held during Channel 4 News’ The UK Decides: Immigration, Law And Order, saw representatives from seven political parties, including the Labour Party, Conservative Party, Liberal Democrats, Green Party, Reform UK, SNP, and Plaid Cymru, confront one another over the pressing issue of immigration.

Reform UK chairman, Richard Tice, suggested that the UK should intercept small boats crossing the Channel and return migrants to France as a means of halting illegal crossings. He argued, “What we’ve got to do is pick people up out of the boats and take them back to France; that will stop the deaths. That’s the compassionate thing to do.”

However, Thomas-Symonds dismissed this proposal as “complete fantasy,” asserting that such a unilateral approach would undermine cooperation with French authorities and potentially damage diplomatic relations. He further expressed pride in the UK’s historical contribution to the ECHR, stating, “To walk away from it and to become an international pariah would make us a country with far less influence on the world stage.”

The debate also saw Green Party co-leader Carla Denyer countering claims that migrants are a burden on public services, particularly the NHS. She stated, “If you meet a migrant in the NHS, they’re more likely to be treating you than to be ahead of you in the queue,” accusing political leaders of scapegoating migrants for the underfunding of essential services.

Conservative Home Office minister Chris Philp also participated in the discussion, defending the government’s approach to immigration. When asked about the UK’s generosity towards refugees, particularly those from Syria and Ukraine, Philp proudly cited the UK’s resettlement schemes, but his remarks were met with groans from both the audience and fellow panellists.

The conversation also included poignant contributions from those with lived experiences of migration. A refugee from Afghanistan expressed disappointment over the dehumanisation of asylum seekers, which was met with support from SNP’s Keith Brown, who described the UK’s handling of Afghan refugees as a betrayal, citing the lack of safe exits for those who had assisted British forces.

The ongoing debate reflects the growing divide in UK politics over immigration policy, as parties take divergent paths in response to the challenges posed by both humanitarian concerns and public sentiment.

Research reveals 93% of dinner meal deals surpass recommended calorie limits, with some containing over 1,500 calories

A study by the University of Birmingham has revealed that almost all supermarket “dine-in” meal deals surpass the UK government’s recommended limit of 600 calories per dinner. Out of the 85 meal deals analysed, a staggering 93% exceeded the calorie guideline, with the highest-calorie option reaching 1,526 calories.

These supermarket meal deals, typically marketed as a cost-effective alternative to dining out, offer a full meal for one or two people, including a main dish, side, dessert, and drinks. While they may be a budget-friendly option, the research highlights that they often fail to meet nutritional guidelines.

Dr Sheena Leek, the study’s lead researcher, commented, “What is healthy for our wallets is not necessarily healthy for our bodies.” The study examined meal deals across three major supermarket chains, finding significant variation in calorie content. At one chain, only 60.3% of the dinner deals exceeded the 600-calorie limit, while at another, nearly all (99.7%) surpassed it.

The average main dish in the meal deals accounted for 51.2% of the recommended calorie intake, but this varied from 39.6% to 78.3% across the stores. Side dishes and desserts consistently contributed between 30% and 50% of the total recommended calorie intake.

Introduced in 2016, the government’s One You campaign encourages healthier eating, with the 400-600-600 guideline advising adults to consume 400 calories for breakfast, 600 for lunch, and 600 for dinner. However, Dr Leek noted that for time-constrained consumers, opting for a “dine-in” meal deal can easily lead to exceeding these recommendations.

The study also found that the inclusion of desserts and drinks significantly increased the calorie content of the meal deals, with the smallest-calorie deals containing only a main and a side dish. While convenient, the research suggests that these meal deals often make it difficult for individuals to adhere to the 600-calorie dinner target.

Oceanographers analyse past storm surges to assess future flood risks in UK and Ireland

Researchers from the University of Southampton have conducted an in-depth study of storm surges that occurred across British and Irish coastlines between 1980 and 2017. The findings aim to enhance future predictions for coastal flooding, as extreme weather events become more frequent due to the impact of climate change.

The study, led by Southampton’s oceanographers, is the most comprehensive analysis of storm surges to date. Storm surges, which occur when wind pushes water onshore, lead to abnormal rises in seawater levels. The intensity of these surges depends on the size, speed, and location of the storm relative to the coastline.

Professor Ivan Haigh, a key researcher in the study, stressed that storm surges are a major cause of flooding along coastal regions. He believes that understanding the factors influencing surges in different locations will improve predictions and allow better preparation for such events. As climate change drives more extreme weather, the study’s findings will enhance the accuracy of models used to predict storm impacts.

The team identified 270 extreme storm surge events over the 37-year period, examining their severity, duration, and geographical reach. They discovered that the Irish Sea’s northern coast experiences the most significant and long-lasting surges, while the southwest of England faces smaller, shorter surges.

Two winters were particularly notable: the 1989/90 winter, which saw devastating flooding in Towyn and Clwyd, Wales, and the 2013/14 winter, which experienced 13 major flooding events. The latter included a severe storm surge in December 2013 that caused extensive damage to properties in East Anglia.

Dr Paula Camus, the study’s lead author, highlighted the importance of analysing past storm surges to better prepare for future coastal flood risks. With climate change likely to increase the frequency of these extreme events, having detailed and accurate data is essential for planning effective responses and infrastructure improvements.

The research, which also involved scientists from Spain, the USA, and the Netherlands, was published in the Weather and Climate Extremes journal. The study also acknowledged the need for future research to include tidal influences in the analysis of storm surges.

Nearly 40% of workers in primary schools and healthcare facilities considering leaving due to overwhelming financial difficulties faced by service users.

A recent study by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation has highlighted the growing strain on primary schools and community healthcare services in the UK, as nearly four million people struggle with essential costs like food and heating. The research, based on surveys of over 1,000 staff across England, Wales, and Scotland, revealed that 60% of primary school and healthcare workers feel that hardship is hindering their ability to perform their jobs effectively. Alarmingly, around 40% of those surveyed have considered quitting their roles due to the overwhelming financial pressure on service users.

Chris Birt, associate director for Scotland at the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, described the level of hardship in the UK as “shameful,” with many individuals unable to afford basic necessities. He stressed that addressing this issue should be a priority for all political parties, especially as the UK government prepares for the upcoming general election in July. According to Birt, no policy for schools or healthcare services will be effective unless it directly addresses the root causes of hardship.

The impact on primary school pupils is particularly concerning, with an estimated 48% of children facing hardship. Many come to school hungry, tired, or emotionally distressed, forcing teachers to spend time supporting them during lessons or even purchasing food for them out of their own pockets. A teacher from west central Scotland described the challenge, saying that when children haven’t eaten breakfast or have faced difficult circumstances at home, their ability to focus and engage in learning is significantly reduced.

The effects of hardship are also being felt in GP surgeries, where 57% of patients have experienced financial difficulties in the past year. Many healthcare professionals reported that these challenges are leading to more frequent, longer, and complex appointments, as patients’ ill health worsens or goes unaddressed due to the inability to afford necessary care. One GP recounted the case of a patient who had missed multiple appointments due to the cost of transport, delaying crucial diagnoses and exacerbating their condition.

The Joseph Rowntree Foundation has called on politicians to urgently address the issue of hardship, urging them to outline both short-term support measures and long-term solutions to ensure that all families can afford the essentials. Birt emphasized that the growing strain on public services is not only detrimental to the well-being of individuals but also adds pressure to already overstretched systems.

Strawberry Hill, home to rare species like nightingales and turtle doves, faces potential loss without funding.

A 150-hectare farm near Bedford, which has been left to nature for over three decades, is at risk of being sold and repurposed for agriculture, prompting a £1.5 million fundraising campaign to preserve the land. Strawberry Hill, once arable farmland, has gradually transformed into a wildlife haven, home to rare species like nightingales, cuckoos, and turtle doves.

This site, which has been a sanctuary for wildlife since the owner ceased farming 37 years ago, has yet to receive official protections. Following the owner’s passing, there were concerns that the land could be returned to agriculture. Fortunately, the Wildlife Trust for Beds, Cambs, and Northants (BCN) has successfully secured half of the property, but to ensure its future, the charity now needs to raise enough money to purchase the remaining land.

Strawberry Hill serves as an exceptional example of rewilding in practice, long before the concept gained widespread attention. It offers a rare, ready-made habitat teeming with wildlife, including 32 pairs of nightingales in an area where their population has declined by 90% across the UK.

The trust’s conservation director, Matt Jackson, explained that the land’s size and its unique history make it a valuable resource for studying both wildlife management and carbon storage. The proposed conservation plan involves maintaining a dynamic mix of scrubland, meadow, and woodland through light grazing by animals such as Highland cattle, which will help preserve open areas crucial for wildlife.

With this appeal, conservationists are hopeful they can secure the future of Strawberry Hill as a key sanctuary for endangered species and a stepping stone for wildlife across Bedfordshire’s agricultural landscape. For more information or to donate, visit: www.wildlifebcn.org/strawberryhillappeal.

Data reveals significant increase in pub closures across England and Wales amid financial pressures.

New government statistics show a dramatic rise in the closure of pubs, with 239 establishments either demolished or repurposed between January and March 2024. This equates to around 80 pubs shutting down every month, representing a 56% increase in closures compared to the same period in 2023. Over the past year, 472 pubs have vanished, a clear indication of the mounting financial strain on the sector.

A combination of high energy costs, inflation in food and drink prices, and a heavy tax burden on hospitality businesses are seen as the main contributors to these closures. Many pubs are being converted into homes, offices, or nurseries, reducing the number of places for communities to gather.

According to Altus Group, the total number of pubs in England and Wales stood at 39,162 by the end of March 2024, down from 39,401 at the close of 2023. The North West of England saw the greatest number of closures, with 35 pubs lost in just three months.

Emma McClarkin, Chief Executive of the British Beer and Pub Association (BBPA), has stated that high operating costs, combined with the sector’s heavy tax burden, are contributing to the closures. With pubs having to pay £1 in every £3 spent to the taxman, the BBPA has called on the government to reduce beer duties and reform business rates in the upcoming General Election.

Political parties have made promises to address business rates, but pub owners are pushing for more detailed and timely solutions to ensure the survival of their businesses.

Despite offers from top clubs, the striker chooses to extend his contract with RB Leipzig.

Benjamin Sesko’s agent, Elvis Basanovic, has admitted that interest from Premier League giants Arsenal and Chelsea was a “great temptation” for the Slovenian striker, but the 21-year-old has ultimately opted to stay with RB Leipzig. The striker recently signed a contract extension with the German club, putting an end to speculation over his future following reports that his £55m release clause had attracted interest from some of Europe’s top clubs.

Basanovic, reflecting on the decision, acknowledged the challenge of resisting offers from such prestigious clubs, noting that it tested their values and vision. He shared on social media: “As a football agent, it’s easy to talk about developing top talents until you’re faced with great temptation. In that moment, your values and vision are truly tested. Development is key. Step by step!”

Sesko enjoyed a breakout season with Leipzig, scoring 18 goals in his debut campaign, and now has his sights set on making an impact in Euro 2024. His decision to stay was described as the “logical” next step in his career, stating that he felt a deep sense of trust and appreciation at Leipzig, which contributed to his growth as a player.

In his statement, Sesko explained: “I’m incredibly happy to be here. The team, the club, the city, and the fans – the overall package is outstanding for me. The early contract extension is the logical step for me. I feel a lot of trust and appreciation throughout the club and that is crucial for delivering my best performances.”

While Arsenal and Chelsea are still in the market for a striker, Sesko’s commitment to Leipzig signals his intention to continue developing at the club, where he has already made a significant impact. With more goals expected from him in the coming seasons, Leipzig fans will be eager to see how he can further contribute to the team’s growth and success.

The social media personality has filed nominations to stand in multiple constituencies, prompting legal scrutiny.

Niko Omilana, a popular YouTube personality with millions of followers, has entered a controversial move by filing as a candidate in 11 constituencies for the upcoming UK General Election, including Richmond, Leeds, and Coventry. His campaign, which was announced via social media, aims to challenge Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, particularly in the Richmond constituency, where Omilana has stated his intention to “remove” Sunak from the political scene.

Omilana, known for his prank-style videos and large online following, previously gained significant attention in 2021 when he garnered nearly 50,000 votes in the London Mayoral election, finishing fifth. However, this time his attempts to stand in multiple constituencies have raised eyebrows. Despite each of the 11 candidates using his name being registered under different addresses, there is concern over the validity of these nominations.

The Electoral Commission has confirmed that they are aware of the situation and are investigating whether Omilana or those submitting his nomination forms have breached electoral laws by providing false information. It is an offence to knowingly submit false details on a nomination form, and if proven, those responsible could face penalties, including a fine or a prison sentence of up to six months.

Omilana, in his campaign videos, states his desire to run against Sunak and his broader goal of becoming Prime Minister. He has expressed his intention to challenge the political system and gain more votes than any other candidate, despite the UK’s Prime Minister being traditionally chosen as the leader of the majority party in Parliament, rather than through a direct popular vote.

The police have been made aware of the potential electoral issue, and investigations are underway. Local authorities in multiple constituencies where the nominations have been received, including Coventry and Leeds, have confirmed they are obliged to accept nominations that meet the legal requirements but have no powers to investigate the validity of the information provided unless falsehoods are proven.

The whisky maker aims to avert industrial action at its distilleries in northern Scotland, as union members prepare for strikes.

Whisky producer Whyte & Mackay has made a “revised offer” to its employees in an effort to avoid planned strikes at three of its Scottish distilleries. Workers at the company’s Dalmore and Invergordon sites in Ross and Cromarty, as well as at Tamnavulin in Moray, had previously voted to strike over pay, with the union accusing the company of offering a raise that didn’t reflect its strong profits.

The strikes were set to begin on June 24, followed by further action in July and August. However, following renewed talks between the company and trade union representatives, Whyte & Mackay has submitted a revised proposal for workers to vote on.

Kieran Healey-Ryder, the company’s head of communication, confirmed the negotiations, stating that the revised offer had been presented to the union for its members’ consideration. He added that contingency plans were in place to manage potential disruptions to suppliers and customers in case the strikes go ahead.

Lesley-Anne MacAskill, GMB Scotland’s organiser in the Highlands, expressed dissatisfaction with the offer, stating that it did not adequately reflect the value of the workers’ skills and experience. She indicated that if the offer is rejected by union members, strike action would proceed as originally planned.

The dispute comes as Whyte & Mackay, owned by Philippine-based Emperador, continues to record strong profits. The company operates several distilleries across Scotland, including Dalmore in Alness, Invergordon, Fettercairn in Aberdeenshire, Tamnavulin near Tomnavoulin, and Jura on the Hebridean island.