The Fifth Storm of the Season Expected to Cause Disruption and Damage Across the Country

Storm Éowyn is poised to unleash severe gales and widespread disruption across the United Kingdom, with winds potentially reaching up to 90mph (145km/h) on Friday. Named by the Met Office, this powerful storm will bring heavy rain, snow in hilly regions, and a stark contrast to the mild, cold weather that has prevailed recently.

The Met Office has issued a yellow wind warning for both Friday and Saturday, with gusts expected to hit 80-90mph (129-145km/h) in areas like Northern Ireland, southern Scotland, and parts of northern and western England and Wales. Coastal regions, especially around the Irish Sea, will experience the strongest winds. Elsewhere, gusts of 50-65mph (80-105km/h) are anticipated, with some coastal areas seeing gusts of up to 80mph (129km/h). There is also the possibility of further warnings being issued or upgraded as the storm progresses.

The arrival of Storm Éowyn marks the fifth named storm of the season and will bring widespread disruption, including potential damage to buildings, power outages, and dangerous travel conditions. High waves and coastal overtopping are also expected, particularly in areas affected by the strongest winds. Although southern parts of the UK may experience milder conditions, snow is forecasted to fall over higher ground in Scotland, northern England, and Northern Ireland.

The rapid intensification of Storm Éowyn is linked to a “supercharged” jet stream, caused by the clash between frigid Arctic air and warmer, milder air to the south. As this powerful jet stream moves across the Atlantic, it will fuel the storm’s development, leading to an even more severe weather event as it nears the UK.

The storm is likely to cause significant disruption, including travel delays, damage to infrastructure, and possible power cuts. It will be important to stay informed by checking the latest weather warnings and forecasts for updates.

José Andrés, Linda Fagan and Other High-Profile Appointees Among Those Dismissed

On the first day of his presidency, Donald Trump wasted no time in asserting his control over the White House, announcing that his Presidential Personnel Office was in the process of identifying and removing individuals from Joe Biden’s administration. Among those dismissed were notable figures, including celebrity chef José Andrés, US Coast Guard Commandant Adm Linda Fagan, and retired General Mark Milley, who had been a member of the National Infrastructure Advisory Council.

In a statement posted on his Truth Social account, President Trump declared that the appointees being removed were not in alignment with his vision to “Make America Great Again.” He emphasised that over a thousand positions would be filled with individuals who share his ideals, with further announcements expected in the days and weeks ahead.

Trump specifically named the individuals being let go, including José Andrés from the President’s Council on Sports, Fitness, and Nutrition, and Mark Milley from the National Infrastructure Advisory Council, as well as Brian Hook and Keisha Lance Bottoms. “YOU’RE FIRED!” Trump wrote, marking a clear break with the previous administration.

General Milley, who had served as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff during Trump’s first term, had recently been the recipient of a pre-emptive pardon from President Biden, just hours before the latter left office. This pardon was not an admission of guilt, Biden clarified, emphasising that it was a gesture of gratitude for Milley’s long service. In a statement, Milley expressed his appreciation for the pardon, stating that after 43 years of service, he wished to avoid unnecessary conflict and distractions.

José Andrés, a renowned chef and philanthropist, was appointed by President Biden in 2022 to co-chair the President’s Council on Sports, Fitness, and Nutrition. However, despite his efforts in humanitarian work through World Central Kitchen, which provides meals during crises, Andrés has been a vocal critic of Trump’s policies. His removal from the council is part of the broader purge of appointees initiated by the new president.

Cryptocurrency Market Surges as Trump and Melania Launch Their Own Digital Coins

The price of Bitcoin has reached an all-time peak just ahead of Donald Trump’s presidential inauguration, contributing to a significant surge in his net worth. This surge is accompanied by Trump’s launch of his own cryptocurrency, the $TRUMP coin, alongside a rival coin created by his wife, Melania, called $MELANIA.

With his presidency on the horizon, Trump has vowed to support the growth of digital currencies, hinting at a relaxation of regulations to encourage their widespread adoption. His entry into the cryptocurrency market, however, has introduced volatility, particularly following the release of his coin, which caused fluctuations in the market.

The $TRUMP coin, unveiled on the evening of January 19, was promoted with a striking image of Trump raising his fist, accompanied by the phrase “FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT,” referencing his defiant response to an assassination attempt at a political rally last July. In his promotion, Trump encouraged his followers to “Have Fun!” with the new digital currencies.

This dual launch by Trump and Melania has further fuelled speculation that the cryptocurrency market could experience major shifts in the coming months, with both coins contributing to the ongoing volatility of the sector.

Lawsuit Filed Right After Trump’s Inauguration Questions the Legitimacy of the ‘Department of Government Efficiency’

A legal challenge has been filed within moments of Donald Trump’s inauguration, questioning the validity of the “Department of Government Efficiency” (Doge) led by Elon Musk. The 30-page lawsuit, acquired by The Washington Post, argues that this newly formed government advisory committee infringes on federal transparency laws. The suit contends that Doge, which Trump claims to have established, does not adhere to essential regulations regarding public disclosure, hiring processes, and operational transparency.

The National Security Counselors, a public interest law firm, asserts that Doge qualifies as a “federal advisory committee”, a designation that demands balanced representation and public accessibility to its meetings. The lawsuit stresses that all meetings, even those held electronically, must be open to public observation, as required by federal law. However, the committee has yet to fulfill these obligations, with records of its activities reportedly kept secret.

Doge, which has already hired numerous staffers working from SpaceX’s Washington, DC office, communicates primarily through encrypted apps like Signal. The project, led by Musk and tech entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy, aims to reduce government inefficiency by cutting down on programs and personnel, though Ramaswamy is expected to step away from the initiative in light of his gubernatorial campaign in Ohio. Reports suggest that Musk has grown dissatisfied with Ramaswamy’s level of involvement in the project, which seeks to overhaul several government agencies and processes.

The legal controversy surrounding Doge is anticipated, with Musk himself acknowledging the potential for “lawfare” tactics to be used against him. While the precise scope of the initiative remains unclear, it is described as an advisory committee with no direct authority to implement government changes on its own.

As per reports from the New York Times, those involved with Doge, including Musk and Ramaswamy, will not receive compensation for their roles and are classified as “special government employees” under federal regulations. The initiative is not intended to be incorporated as an external entity but rather functions as an informal collective, loyal to Musk’s leadership and vision.

Prospective hires for the project include prominent Silicon Valley figures such as Marc Andreessen, Shaun Maguire, and Baris Akis. However, critics, like Sam Hammond, Senior Economist at the Foundation for American Innovation, argue that Doge does not fulfil the legal criteria to be considered a federal advisory committee. Hammond suggests that Doge is, in reality, more of a branding exercise for Trump’s broader reform agenda.

The aftermath of the war in Gaza highlights staggering casualties, displacement, and destruction.

After 15 months of brutal fighting, a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas has been reached, marking an end to the war in Gaza. The conflict, which began on 7 October 2023 with a deadly Hamas attack that killed 1,200 Israelis and took 250 hostages, led to devastating retaliation by Israel. The subsequent bombardment of Gaza resulted in severe loss of life, with over 46,700 Palestinians killed, one in four of them children, and nearly two million displaced. The war has caused a deep humanitarian crisis, with widespread hunger and destruction of vital infrastructure.

As of the latest reports, more than 110,000 Palestinians have been injured, and nearly half of Gaza’s hospitals are no longer fully operational. The UN reports that more than 340,000 people in Gaza are facing extreme hunger, and over 12,000 individuals need urgent medical evacuation. The conflict has also heavily impacted Israel, with over 5,000 injuries and the destruction of significant infrastructure.

The scale of the devastation is evident in the numbers: over 8,200 rockets fired from Gaza, 40,000 targets struck by Israeli forces, and significant loss of life in the occupied West Bank as well. More than 370 aid workers have died in Gaza, and international support has poured in, with the UK committing £100 million in aid.

This grim tally underlines the catastrophic consequences of a war that has engulfed not only the region but also threatens broader stability in the Middle East. As the ceasefire holds, the true cost of the conflict continues to unfold, with no clear end in sight to the suffering.

Animals, including dolphins and otters, are being affected by harmful PFAS substances, which have been linked to serious health issues.

Recent analysis has uncovered widespread contamination in various UK wildlife, including otters, dolphins, fish, birds, and porpoises, all of which have been found to carry toxic “forever chemicals” in their tissues. These chemicals, known as PFAS, are manmade substances that persist in the environment and human body, failing to break down over time. Widely used in industrial processes and consumer products, PFAS have been associated with severe health risks, such as cancers, in both humans and animals.

Over 1,000 animals have been examined, revealing alarming levels of PFAS contamination, especially from two harmful substances, PFOS and PFOA, which have been banned due to their toxicity. Despite the ban, over 10,000 different types of PFAS exist, and much remains unknown about their full toxicological impact. Data from Watershed Investigations, the Marine Conservation Society, and the Guardian shows high PFAS levels, especially in top predators such as otters (up to 9,962μg/kg) and harbour porpoises (2,420μg/kg).

These findings highlight the ongoing pollution of UK ecosystems, particularly from industries like chemicals manufacturing, airports, military sites, and sewage treatment plants. Even old landfills along rivers and coasts are contributing to the spread of these harmful chemicals. Despite regulatory efforts, many animal species, including fish, are still showing PFAS levels above safety thresholds.

Experts warn that these substances could cause long-lasting damage, potentially leading to extinction for certain species. PFAS chemicals, much like PCBs that were banned decades ago, continue to accumulate in the environment, posing long-term risks. The government’s response, including potential bans and stricter regulations, remains a crucial factor in preventing further harm.

The call for urgent action is growing, with leading scientists and environmental groups demanding stricter regulations and bans on non-essential uses of PFAS, alongside financial support for ecological restoration.

Fear, grief, and cold define the waiting as Gazans anticipate news of a truce

As Gaza endures relentless airstrikes, bitterly cold nights, and scarce resources, its people anxiously await confirmation of a ceasefire deal between Hamas and Israel. On Thursday, amidst delayed announcements, millions hoped for a pause in the violence that has devastated the territory for over 15 months.

Palestinians expressed fears that the ceasefire may falter, prolonging a conflict that has claimed tens of thousands of lives and left much of Gaza in ruins. “The news is tense about the deal … the Israelis do not want Gaza to rest,” said Muhammad al-Hebbil, 37, displaced early in the war from Beit Lahiya to Gaza City.

The agreement, brokered by Qatar on Wednesday, was expected to begin before the US presidential inauguration on Monday. However, reports of disagreements, including accusations that Hamas reneged on parts of the deal and delays in Israeli cabinet approval, have heightened concerns.

Lives Lost Amid Ceasefire Hopes
Heavy bombardments continued in Gaza, with both sides ramping up attacks ahead of the expected ceasefire. Local health officials reported nearly 80 fatalities on Thursday alone, bringing the death toll since the offensive began to over 46,700, primarily civilians.

Ashraf Ahmed Fuaad, a father of three from Khan Younis, described his family’s struggle in the cold. “We are waiting for the ceasefire as if we are waiting for the moon to rise, dispelling the darkness of the night,” he said, adding that their hopes for peace extend beyond Gaza to the entire Middle East.

Others shared tragic accounts of loss. Saeed Alloush recounted a devastating overnight strike that killed 40 members of his extended family. “It was the happiest night since 7 October,” he said, “until we heard of the martyrdom.”

Humanitarian Crisis Deepens
The ongoing conflict has displaced 90% of Gaza’s 2.3 million residents, with tented camps sprawling across destroyed fields and beaches. Infrastructure, including power, water, and healthcare systems, has been obliterated, leaving millions vulnerable to famine and disease.

Aid organisations have called for urgent humanitarian relief, warning of dire shortages in food, medicine, and fuel. The United Nations estimates that clearing the rubble alone could take 15 years and cost up to $600 million, with full reconstruction requiring decades.

Uncertainty Clouds the Future
Despite the anticipated ceasefire, many in Gaza remain sceptical. “I feel we will be betrayed,” said Eman, a 19-year-old medical student from Jabaliya. “I fear the war will return after Israel gets its prisoners.”

With Gaza’s future governance and reconstruction funding unclear, the region’s residents continue to face a precarious reality, torn between fragile hope and persistent fear.

Key departures from historical customs mark this year’s events

Since George Washington’s first inauguration in 1789, traditions like the oath of office and inaugural address have been fundamental to the US presidential transition. However, long-held customs have faced disruptions in recent years.

Four years ago, Republican Donald Trump became the first outgoing president in over 150 years to skip his successor’s inauguration, citing unsubstantiated claims about election fraud. In 2025, Trump will return to the White House ceremonially on 20 January, the constitutionally mandated date for the presidential inauguration.

Democrats have highlighted the contrast between this year’s orderly power transfer and the chaos of 2021, marked by the Capitol riot. Yet, they too are departing from some traditions in smaller but notable ways.

Michelle Obama and Other Key Figures Decline Attendance
Former First Lady Michelle Obama has announced she will not attend the 47th president’s inauguration alongside her husband, Barack Obama, on Monday. Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has also stated she will skip the ceremony, with other Democrats potentially following suit, though no organised boycott has been planned, unlike the one for Trump’s first inauguration in 2017.

The Obamas provided no explanation for the decision, which comes shortly after Michelle Obama’s absence from Jimmy Carter’s funeral. Her husband attended, interacting with Trump, while other living former first ladies were present. Michelle Obama had attended both inaugurations since leaving the White House, including Trump’s in 2017, which she later criticised for its lack of diversity.

Outgoing Vice President Harris Skips VP Residence Meeting
Traditionally, the outgoing vice president hosts their successor at the VP’s residence. However, sources report that Kamala Harris has not extended this invitation to JD Vance. The Harris team has cited her focus on responding to catastrophic wildfires in Los Angeles as a reason for the omission.

This break with tradition mirrors the 2021 transition when Harris took over from Mike Pence amid political tensions. The Harris team denied receiving an invitation from Pence, which his team claims was discreetly offered.

Biden forgoes a Farewell Press Conference
President Joe Biden is unlikely to hold a final press conference, a tradition upheld by presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama but ignored by Trump in 2020.

Biden’s administration has defended his media interactions, pointing to a recent address and a scheduled interview with MSNBC. However, Biden has held fewer press conferences than any president in decades, averaging only 9.4 annually, according to the American Presidency Project.

For insights into US politics, Anthony Zurcher breaks down key developments in his US Election Unspun newsletter. Readers in the UK can subscribe here, while international audiences can join here.

A tragic crash between two British skiers at Les Arcs leaves one dead and another injured.

A 62-year-old British woman has tragically passed away following a severe collision with another skier in the French Alps. The incident occurred at around 10:30am on Tuesday at the Les Arcs ski resort, located in the Savoie region.

The crash took place on a black slope of the Aiguille Rouge mountain. Emergency responders quickly arrived at the scene and attempted to revive the woman, who had suffered traumatic shock. Despite their efforts, she was pronounced dead at the site, according to local news outlet Le Dauphiné.

The other skier involved, a 35-year-old British man, was stationary on the piste at the time of the crash and sustained a broken leg. He was transported to a nearby hospital for treatment. Both skiers were reportedly wearing helmets during the incident.

An investigation into the cause of the collision is currently underway.

A spokesperson from the UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) confirmed to The Independent that they are providing support to the family of the deceased and are in communication with French authorities regarding the matter.

Les Arcs is a renowned ski resort in the French Alps, popular with skiers from around the world.

The World Economic Forum’s annual survey identifies armed conflict and extreme weather as immediate risks, while long-term concerns centre on climate change and technological challenges.

World leaders have highlighted escalating armed conflict as the most pressing global threat for 2025, while the climate crisis is expected to dominate concerns over the next decade, according to the World Economic Forum (WEF).

Ahead of the WEF’s annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland, next week, more than 900 leaders from various sectors, including business, politics, and academia, were surveyed about the risks they perceive as most urgent.

Looking specifically at the year ahead, 23% of respondents pointed to “state-based armed conflict” as the biggest threat, exacerbated by ongoing wars, such as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, along with deadly clashes in Sudan and Gaza. Additionally, 14% of those surveyed identified “extreme weather events” as a significant concern for 2025, citing the devastating wildfires in Los Angeles as a prominent example.

Last year saw catastrophic weather events such as floods, droughts, and fires, highlighting the growing impact of climate change. Experts have warned that rising global temperatures are making such events both more frequent and more intense. When asked to consider long-term risks, respondents listed four major climate-related issues among their top ten concerns: extreme weather events, biodiversity loss, changes to Earth systems, and resource shortages.

Gim Huay Neo, managing director of the WEF, emphasised the urgency of addressing the climate and nature crisis, noting that 2024 saw global warming reach a record 1.54°C above pre-industrial levels, contributing to unprecedented weather disasters worldwide.

Concerns related to technological innovation were also prominent, with “misinformation and disinformation” and “negative outcomes of AI technologies” following closely behind the climate-related risks. As misinformation concerns grow, particularly with Donald Trump’s return to power in the US, the issue of online regulation is becoming a key topic. Trump’s alignment with Silicon Valley figures who advocate for less stringent online policies is expected to influence global discourse on digital platforms.

Artificial intelligence, while seen as a potential driver of economic growth, also raises alarms about its risks. Some experts warn that AI could pose existential threats to humanity if its capabilities surpass human intelligence.

This year’s Davos meeting, which will be held against the backdrop of Trump’s inauguration, is expected to host 60 heads of state and government, along with top CEOs and activists. The theme of the event is “a call for collaboration in the intelligent age”, although there are concerns that Trump’s administration could hinder cooperation on global issues, including climate change. Trump has suggested that he would withdraw the US from the Paris climate agreement and increase fossil fuel extraction, which may complicate international efforts to tackle climate change.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is expected to address the gathering, seeking global support for Ukraine’s ongoing conflict with Russia. Trump has claimed he will end the war swiftly, though the specifics of his approach remain unclear.