Brentford striker included in squad for Euro 2024 qualifiers despite potential ban.

Ivan Toney has made his return to Gareth Southgate’s England squad for the upcoming Euro 2024 qualifiers against Italy and Ukraine, despite facing a potential ban due to ongoing gambling rule breaches.

The Brentford striker is included in Southgate’s first selection since the team’s exit from the World Cup quarter-finals against France last December. Toney, who scored his 17th goal of the season in a recent 2-0 victory over Southampton, missed out on the Qatar tournament despite being part of the squad for Nations League matches against Germany and Italy in September.

Notably absent from the squad is Chelsea’s Raheem Sterling, who missed the Blues’ recent 3-1 win against Leicester. Toney’s inclusion means Aston Villa’s Ollie Watkins, who has netted six goals in his last seven appearances, is left out.

Despite the ongoing police investigation surrounding Manchester City right-back Kyle Walker, he remains in the 25-man squad, while other notable absences include Ben White, Conor Coady, Callum Wilson, and Trent Alexander-Arnold, all of whom featured in the World Cup.

Ben Chilwell earns a recall to the squad for the first time since the 10-0 win against San Marino in November 2021. Harry Maguire retains his position despite limited appearances for Manchester United this year. Leicester’s James Maddison, who suffered a knee injury that affected his World Cup participation, is also included, alongside Kalvin Phillips, despite his limited game time with Manchester City.

England will travel to Naples to face Italy on March 23, followed by a home match against Ukraine on March 26 in Group C.

England Squad:
Goalkeepers: Jordan Pickford (Everton), Nick Pope (Newcastle United), Aaron Ramsdale (Arsenal)
Defenders: Ben Chilwell (Chelsea), Eric Dier (Tottenham), Marc Guehi (Crystal Palace), Reece James (Chelsea), Harry Maguire (Manchester United), Luke Shaw (Manchester United), John Stones (Manchester City), Kieran Trippier (Newcastle United), Kyle Walker (Manchester City)

Emergency services conduct a remarkable rescue operation amid severe weather conditions.

Emergency services conducted a remarkable rescue operation to save a man who was struggling for survival in the fast-moving Los Angeles River in Boyle Heights.

This incident occurred amid an atmospheric river event that impacted California on March 15, resulting in heavy rainfall and flooding. Dramatic video footage showed the moment a helicopter lifted the man from the turbulent waters, emphasising the urgency of the situation.

According to paramedics from the LAFD, the man was experiencing hypothermia due to his time spent in the icy river. He was subsequently transported to a hospital for further medical evaluation and care.

This case highlights the serious risks associated with severe weather conditions and rapidly flowing water. Authorities are urging the public to remain cautious during such extreme weather events.

Bridget Phillipson’s Vision Outshines Tory Proposals

Bridget Phillipson, the shadow education secretary, has been at the forefront of advocating for comprehensive childcare reform in the UK. Her vision includes a robust focus on pre-school, after-school, and breakfast clubs, aiming to address the failures of the current nursery and childminder system. Recently, Phillipson delivered a significant speech outlining how these issues contribute to the productivity malaise affecting families and the economy.

Shortly after her address, Chancellor Jeremy Hunt announced a series of childcare reforms in his Budget, highlighting a government commitment to pilot and roll out “extended school” programs for primary pupils. This initiative would grant parents of children aged five to 11 access to breakfast and after-school clubs. However, Labour now faces the challenge of responding to the Tories’ proposals, which some perceive as a diluted version of what Phillipson has been advocating.

One critical point of contention is that Hunt’s reforms appear to disproportionately benefit wealthier families. For instance, couples earning nearly £200,000 could receive 30 free hours of nursery care, while the poorest families are limited to just 15 hours. This disparity is unlikely to resonate with Labour’s vision, which seeks to ensure equitable access to quality childcare for all families.

In the lead-up to the next election, Labour has a prime opportunity to emphasize that Hunt’s reforms do not adequately address the needs of parents, who represent around 14 million potential voters. Parents are not merely looking for more free childcare; they want assurance that these services provide meaningful enrichment for their children. Focus groups reveal that many parents are concerned that after-school programs lack substance, and they are eager for offerings that include music, drama, arts, sports, and essential life skills.

Labour should capitalize on this sentiment by promoting a vision that extends beyond mere hours of care. The party could outline a comprehensive plan to enhance the quality of nursery and childminder services, emphasizing the professional development of the early years workforce through improved pay and training opportunities.

Phillipson has previously stated that her childcare reform plans would be unprecedented, likening their scale to the creation of the NHS in 1945. Despite the Tory Budget, this comparison remains a powerful narrative. While the Conservatives may modify an already flawed system, Labour can present a transformative approach aimed at building a new, equitable framework for childcare.

As the political landscape shifts, Labour has the chance to assert its commitment to meaningful childcare reform, ensuring that every child receives the best possible start in life. By focusing on quality, equity, and enrichment, Labour can turn the Tory challenge into an opportunity to reinforce its vision for a better future for families across the UK.

Should Celebrities Hold Their Employers to Ransom?

The recent saga involving Gary Lineker and the BBC has sparked intense debate about the role of celebrities in holding corporations accountable. Lineker’s reinstatement, following his controversial tweet, was reportedly influenced by Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s intervention, underscoring the complexities of celebrity influence in today’s media landscape.

While this incident may feel like a significant victory for Lineker and his supporters, it raises important questions about the balance of power between public figures and the organizations they represent. Sunak’s comment that the BBC and Lineker should resolve their issues “in a timely fashion” suggests that even political leaders recognize the weight of celebrity in shaping public discourse.

At the heart of this issue is the BBC’s need to review its guidelines, as they seem inconsistent and often subjective. Different celebrities, from Alan Sugar to David Attenborough, have faced varying responses for similar actions, highlighting the inadequacy of a “one size fits all” approach to social media conduct. Lineker’s case has become emblematic of this inconsistency, reflecting a broader cultural struggle over the limits of free expression in the public sphere.

Lineker’s situation can be likened to a modern-day David versus Goliath narrative. His stature and loyalty from fans and colleagues made it difficult for the BBC to sever ties, despite their claims of rule-breaking. The ambiguity of the guidelines concerning his contract only further complicated the situation, revealing a weak case against him. If the BBC had substantial grounds for dismissal, it could have acted swiftly. Instead, the organization found itself in a precarious position, unable to silence a voice that resonates with many.

This incident raises a critical point: if a public figure expresses opinions that align with a significant portion of the population, can their employer justifiably impose restrictions on their speech? Lineker’s views, particularly on pressing issues like the humanitarian crisis in Ukraine or the plight of nurses advocating for better conditions, reflect widely held sentiments. Attempts to silence him are often rooted in political motivations rather than genuine concern for impartiality.

The fallout from this controversy demonstrates that while celebrities hold considerable influence, they are not invulnerable to the repercussions of their actions. However, the outcome suggests a trend where celebrity power can challenge corporate authority, albeit not without its own risks. There are instances where the balance of power shifts in favor of corporations, but in this case, celebrity prevailed.

Ultimately, the Lineker episode serves as a reminder of the intricate relationship between public figures and the institutions they represent. It calls for a reevaluation of how organizations approach their guidelines and the implications of celebrity influence in shaping narratives and public opinion. As society navigates these dynamics, the conversation around free speech, corporate responsibility, and the role of celebrities in activism will undoubtedly continue to evolve.

Stephen Pritchard’s Disruptive Action Sparks Debate on Climate Protests

Stephen Pritchard, a 63-year-old protester from Bath, has been sentenced to five weeks in prison for blocking traffic on the M4 motorway during an Insulate Britain demonstration in October 2021. The protest, which disrupted around 10,000 vehicles at Junction 3, has drawn significant attention to the ongoing debate around climate activism and civil disobedience.

Pritchard was sentenced at Inner London Crown Court, while his three co-defendants—Ruth Cook, 71, Roman Paluch-Machnik, 29, and Oliver Rock, 42—received six-week suspended sentences and 100 hours of community service each. Judge Silas Reid noted that Pritchard had expressed a commitment to continue similar protests, stating, “It is not appropriate for me to suspend the inevitable sentence… you will serve up to half of your sentence in prison.”

The judge highlighted the lack of remorse shown by the defendants, commenting that they appeared to take pride in their actions. The protest involved gluing themselves to the tarmac near Heathrow Airport, blocking traffic for approximately two hours. Judge Reid described the operation as “carefully planned” and acknowledged that while they had intended to allow emergency vehicles to pass, the disruption still caused significant harm.

The judge remarked, “Well over 10,000 people were significantly negatively impacted by your actions. People would have lost earnings, missed appointments, and potentially missed flights.” He indicated that the standard sentence for such actions would typically be around 12 months but was reduced due to the protesters’ aim to highlight the climate crisis.

Pritchard’s co-defendants expressed admiration for his bravery, with Rock stating, “I’m sad to see that brave man go to prison today,” while Cook described the decision to refrain from future protests as one of the most difficult she has ever made.

The Insulate Britain group noted that this was the first instance of climate activists in the UK being convicted of the common law offence of public nuisance, a charge that can carry a maximum penalty of life imprisonment. Judge Reid acknowledged the historical significance of protest in the UK but reiterated that the right to protest does not justify disrupting the lives of thousands.

As the defendants prepare to adapt their protest strategies in light of increasing legal repercussions, they emphasize the importance of continuing their advocacy for climate issues, albeit through different means.

Insolvency Filing Leads to Major Downsizing and Job Losses

Germany’s last major department store chain, Galeria Karstadt Kaufhof, is set to close two-fifths of its branches, following a recent insolvency protection filing for the second time in less than three years. The company’s employee council announced on Monday that the chain plans to shut 52 of its 129 stores, resulting in the loss of over 5,000 jobs, according to the German news agency dpa.

The company, formed from the merger of rivals Karstadt and Kaufhof, cited soaring energy prices and declining consumer spending as key factors leading to its financial difficulties. In late October, it sought protection from creditors amidst these ongoing challenges.

Previously, during the first lockdown of the coronavirus pandemic in April 2020, Galeria Karstadt Kaufhof closed around 40 stores and cut approximately 4,000 jobs. At that time, it received around 680 million euros ($724 million) in state aid to help stabilize its operations.

The planned closures are part of a broader trend affecting department stores in Germany, as they struggle to adapt to changing consumer habits and economic pressures.

Crisis Deepens as Key Presenters Withdraw from Programming

On Saturday afternoon, the BBC made the decision to pull part of its Radio 5 Live sports coverage, escalating the ongoing crisis within the corporation.

With both Football Focus and Final Score removed from BBC One’s schedule, the first two hours of 5 Live Sport were cut and replaced with pre-recorded podcasts. Sky News reported that host Mark Chapman withdrew from the afternoon’s programming, following earlier withdrawals by Football Focus presenter Alex Scott and Final Score host Jason Mohammed.

Despite these changes, 5 Live Sport returned to provide commentary for the 3pm Premier League match between Leeds and Brighton, while BBC Radio Wales broadcast the first half of the Six Nations game between England and Italy. Notably, Chapman did not participate in the broadcast.

Former Aston Villa striker and 5 Live pundit Dion Dublin expressed his solidarity with colleagues by announcing on social media that he would be boycotting the broadcast: “In solidarity with my BBC Sport colleagues, NO 5live for me today!” Similarly, ex-Everton midfielder Leon Osman tweeted his support, stating he would not appear on 5 Live.

The scheduled edition of Fighting Talk was also replaced with a pre-recorded podcast at 11am, and another podcast aired at 12pm instead of the anticipated 5 Live Sport programme.

Despite the upheaval, the afternoon’s schedule included commentary for the rugby union match between England and France in the Six Nations, which is expected to proceed as planned.

Protesters Demand End to Military Support for Ukraine

On Saturday, thousands gathered in Prague to express their discontent with the Czech government, protesting against high inflation and calling for a halt to military support for Ukraine.

The rally, organized by a new political group named PRO (Law, Respect, Expertise), took place in Wenceslas Square as part of an anti-poverty initiative. Party leader Jindrich Rajchl stated that the protesters seek “a government to care first of all about the interests of the Czech citizens.”

Rajchl’s group attributes the rising energy prices to the European Union, as inflation in Czechia saw a slight decrease to 16.7% in February from 17.5% in January. Additionally, PRO is advocating for the government to cease efforts aimed at combating misinformation and fake news.

The issue of Ukraine was prominent during the demonstration, with attendees demanding a peaceful resolution to the ongoing conflict. Some participants displayed the letter “Z,” a symbol associated with the Russian military, on their bags, chanting slogans like “Stop the war, stop NATO.”

Historically, the Czech Republic has been a strong supporter of Ukraine, providing military assistance and welcoming approximately half a million refugees since the onset of the Russian invasion.

Supermarket Confirms All Limits Will Be Removed by Monday

Aldi has announced that it will eliminate all customer limits on fresh produce starting Monday, as supply issues that caused widespread shortages begin to improve.

This move aligns with similar decisions made by Lidl and Asda, who are also lifting restrictions on fruit and vegetables. In a statement released on Saturday, Aldi confirmed, “From Monday (March 13), Aldi will remove all purchasing restrictions on fresh produce – including limits on tomatoes, peppers, and cucumbers.”

Lidl will also remove all restrictions on its fruit and vegetable sales by the same day. Asda has already lifted its three-item limit on cucumbers, lettuce, salad bags, broccoli, cauliflower, and raspberries, although it retains a limit of three on tomatoes and peppers.

The overall availability of fresh produce has improved as anticipated, with supplies of tomatoes and peppers expected to return to normal within a couple of weeks. Shortages of tomatoes began around February 20, attributed to a combination of adverse weather conditions and transport issues in North Africa and Europe.

These shortages extended to other products, leaving shelves bare of cucumbers, peppers, and lettuce. Major retailers like Tesco, Aldi, and Lidl implemented limits of three items per person for certain vegetables, while Morrisons restricted customers to two items each on tomatoes, cucumbers, lettuce, and peppers.

Production issues in Morocco, including unusually cold nights affecting tomato ripening, were exacerbated by heavy rains, flooding, and ferry cancellations, which hindered the volume of produce reaching the UK. Supply challenges from Spain, another major winter source, were similarly impacted by adverse weather.

Domestic producers also faced difficulties, having to reduce greenhouse usage due to rising electricity costs. Environment Secretary Therese Coffey drew attention when she suggested that British consumers should consider eating more turnips instead of relying on imported foods amid these shortages.

The National Farmers’ Union (NFU) has warned that the shortages of certain fruits and vegetables in UK supermarkets could be just “the tip of the iceberg.” Deputy President Tom Bradshaw noted that the UK’s reliance on imports has made it vulnerable to “shock weather events,” urging the need for the country to take control of its food production in light of global volatility caused by the war in Europe and climate change.

Documents Uncover Her Use of Nutritional Supplements from Barbara Cartland

Recently released documents indicate that Margaret Thatcher had a penchant for alternative health treatments, receiving various remedies from the prolific romance novelist Barbara Cartland.

Thatcher, known for her minimal sleep of just four hours nightly, was gifted “nutrimental capsules” by Cartland to combat fatigue. On another occasion, she received additional supplements, likely intended to alleviate jetlag before a journey to the Far East.

Cartland maintained a regular correspondence with Thatcher and even shared meals with her. In a package dated June 8, 1989, she wrote, “My dear prime minister, you were wonderful last night, as usual. It is incredible, with all you do, how you can still look as though you were 25.”

She continued by enclosing the latest health product designed to enhance oxygen distribution throughout the body, claiming it helped her son feel youthful at 51 and herself remarkably spry at nearly 88.

On June 15, 1989, Thatcher expressed her gratitude to Cartland for the “charming letter” and the capsules. Cartland later reached out to Thatcher’s diary secretary, Amanda Ponsonby, on July 3, 1989, with more supplements for the prime minister’s upcoming trip, emphasising their lack of side effects.

Additionally, industrialist Emmanuel Kaye, a former Conservative supporter, offered Thatcher advice on vitamins after seeing her at an opera. He proposed to optimise her supplement regimen and mentioned a unique form of homeopathy he had developed.

In the same year, a Vanity Fair profile referred to Thatcher’s use of “electric baths” as part of her anti-aging regimen, which attracted considerable media attention.

Chris Collins from the Margaret Thatcher Foundation noted that references to health treatments in Thatcher’s letters were somewhat obscure, yet he believed her interest was genuine. The Foundation is in the process of releasing her private files, available for public access at [Margaret Thatcher Foundation].